PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-7820EQ + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 browser benchmark
PC SCORE35OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 18 September 2026 · 04:40 EEST

Intel Core i7-7820EQ+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:40
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU25

Processor throughput

Single thread
319.19 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,435.74 Mops/s
Compression proxy
404.0 MB/s
GPU33

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
3,909.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
49.1 FPS
Frame time p95
16.80 ms
MEMORY63

System memory

Effective bandwidth
19.97 GB/s
Latency proxy
35.9 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
2.61 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-7820EQ comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Kaby Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

No faster peer is available in this comparison set.

  1. Intel Core i7-7820EQKaby Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2017
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  2. Intel Core i5-7440EQKaby Lake · 4 cores / 4 threads · 2017
    −12.6%lower estimate
  3. Intel Xeon E3-1501M v6Kaby Lake · 4 cores / 4 threads · 2016
    −12.6%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA TITAN XpGeForce 10 · 12 GB VRAM · 2017
    +37.0%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 TiGeForce 10 · 11 GB VRAM · 2017
    +27.8%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA TITAN X PascalGeForce 10 · 12 GB VRAM · 2016
    +23.7%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2017
    −7.7%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    −27.2%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GBGeForce 10 · 6 GB VRAM · 2016
    −50.6%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY81.8%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW220 SEC DROPPED FRAMES18.24%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 86/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 219942,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-7820EQ",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1922,
        "graphics_card_id": 5
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 220,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 18.242
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 319194189.559,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1435738229.375,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 404.013
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 19.967,
            "latency_ns": 35.898
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 49.065,
            "compute_gflops": 3909.366,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.61,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 11.17902457,
        "gpu": 3.257805
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 25,
        "gpu": 33,
        "memory": 63,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 35,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 25,
        "gpu": 33,
        "memory": 63,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 35,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again