PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-7700HQ + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti browser benchmark
PC SCORE12OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 6 October 2026 · 05:40 EEST

Intel Core i7-7700HQ+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:56
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU19

Processor throughput

Single thread
353.44 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,345.91 Mops/s
Compression proxy
428.7 MB/s
GPU3

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
1,320.2 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
17.8 FPS
Frame time p95
20.00 ms
MEMORY14

System memory

Effective bandwidth
15.66 GB/s
Latency proxy
43.3 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
2.28 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-7700HQ comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Kaby Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6Kaby Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2017
    +6.0%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7-7700HQKaby Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2017
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Core i5-7440HQKaby Lake · 4 cores / 4 threads · 2017
    −10.0%lower estimate
  4. Intel Core m3-7Y32Kaby Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2017
    −54.7%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2017
    +282.7%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    +201.9%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GBGeForce 10 · 6 GB VRAM · 2016
    +104.7%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce 10 · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −13.1%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −47.2%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2021
    −65.0%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY96.4%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW56 SEC DROPPED FRAMES3.60%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The run did not complete; the tab was hidden or a selected stage failed.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Fair · 65/100
Performance index
11.3 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
Original PC Score
25/100 at run time
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 55913,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-7700HQ",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1918,
        "graphics_card_id": 2
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 56,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 3.604
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 353441241.443,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1345906023.137,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 428.722
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 15.663,
            "latency_ns": 43.338
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 17.784,
            "compute_gflops": 1320.201,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 20
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.279,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 11.48261185,
        "gpu": 1.1001675,
        "memory": 1.14312867
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "incomplete"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 26,
        "gpu": 11,
        "memory": 55,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 25,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 19,
        "gpu": 3,
        "memory": 14,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 12,
        "performance_index": 11.29,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again