PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-7500U + NVIDIA GeForce 940MX browser benchmark
PC SCORE10OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 15 October 2026 · 19:21 EEST

Intel Core i7-7500U+NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIN/A ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:28
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU5

Processor throughput

Single thread
148.11 Mops/s
Multi thread
181.47 Mops/s
Compression proxy
152.6 MB/s
GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

No completed GPU measurement was recorded for this run.

MEMORY20

System memory

Effective bandwidth
4.86 GB/s
Latency proxy
291.8 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-7500U comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Kaby Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6Kaby Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2017
    +49.1%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i5-7267UKaby Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2017
    +5.7%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i7-7500UKaby Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2016
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. Intel Core i5-7300UKaby Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2017
    −1.5%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core m3-7Y32Kaby Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2017
    −36.3%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce 940MX comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    +48.7%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce 945MGeForce 900M · 1 GB VRAM · 2016
    +19.7%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce 930MXGeForce 900M · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    +2.6%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce 940MXGeForce 900M · 1 GB VRAM · 2016
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2021
    −1.3%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce 920MXGeForce 900M · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −32.9%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GT 710GeForce 700 · 1 GB VRAM · 2016
    −78.9%lower estimate
03 / RUN QUALITY40.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW28 SEC RUN QUALITY40/100

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The run did not complete; the tab was hidden or a selected stage failed.
  • No GPU API was available in this browser.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
N/A
Browser
Chrome 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Limited · 40/100
Performance index
9.3 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 28497,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-7500U",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce 940MX",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "unavailable",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "chrome",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "processor_id": 1912,
        "graphics_card_id": 2088
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 28,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 148114723.695,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 181472912.282,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 152.568
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 4.864,
            "latency_ns": 291.781,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 2.95889431,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 0.27422457
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "incomplete",
        "gpu_unavailable"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 5,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 20,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 10,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 5,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 20,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 10,
        "performance_index": 9.25,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again