PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-6700 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB browser benchmark
PC SCORE55OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADED
Limited quality run 27 September 2026 · 06:10 EEST

Intel Core i7-6700+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

Capable performance; the category detail shows where this system is strongest.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIN/A ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:09
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU48

Processor throughput

Single thread
783.53 Mops/s
Multi thread
2,760.32 Mops/s
Compression proxy
466.0 MB/s
GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

No completed GPU measurement was recorded for this run.

MEMORY71

System memory

Effective bandwidth
23.29 GB/s
Latency proxy
19.1 ns
Browser RAM class
— GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-6700 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Skylake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon W-3175XSkylake · 28 cores / 56 threads · 2018
    +103.5%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i9-9820X X-seriesSkylake · 10 cores / 20 threads · 2018
    +46.8%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i7-6700Skylake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2015
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. Intel Core i5-6685RSkylake · 4 cores / 4 threads · 2016
    −14.8%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    +125.1%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2017
    +107.9%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    +64.0%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GBGeForce 10 · 3 GB VRAM · 2016
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce 10 · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    −45.7%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −52.8%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    −71.3%lower estimate
03 / RUN QUALITY32.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW9 SEC RUN QUALITY32/100
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
N/A
Run quality
Limited · 32/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 9234,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-6700",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "unavailable",
        "processor_id": 1892,
        "graphics_card_id": 2089
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 9,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 783532745.345,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 2760321113.578,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 466.024
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 23.291,
            "latency_ns": 19.122
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 21.39740497,
        "gpu": null
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 48,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 71,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 55,
        "grade": "D"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 48,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 71,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 55,
        "grade": "D",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again