PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-6500U + AMD Radeon R7 M460 browser benchmark
PC SCORE8OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 10 October 2026 · 02:24 EEST

Intel Core i7-6500U+AMD Radeon R7 M460

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:58
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU9

Processor throughput

Single thread
195.28 Mops/s
Multi thread
474.88 Mops/s
Compression proxy
365.5 MB/s
GPU0

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
176.8 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
31.0 FPS
Frame time p95
50.10 ms
MEMORY22

System memory

Effective bandwidth
4.99 GB/s
Latency proxy
220.4 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.83 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-6500U comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Skylake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon E3-1515M v5Skylake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2016
    +53.5%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i5-6350HQSkylake · 4 cores / 4 threads · 2016
    +17.1%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i7-6500USkylake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2015
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon R7 M460 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon R7 M465XGem System(R7 M400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    +20.3%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon 540Polaris(RX 500) · 1 GB VRAM · 2017
    +15.2%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon R7 350Pirate Islands(R7 300) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    +3.8%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon R7 M460Gem System(R7 M400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon R5 M465Gem System(R5 M400) · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    −1.3%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon R5 M445Gem System(R5 M400) · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    −10.1%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon R5 435 OEMArctic Islands(R5 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −16.5%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY51.6%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW58 SEC DROPPED FRAMES48.44%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
  • The browser ran the GPU test on a different adapter than the selected graphics card, often the integrated GPU.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Chrome 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Limited · 41/100
Performance index
7.9 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 57860,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-6500U",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon R7 M460",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "chrome",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "intel",
        "gpu_architecture": "gen-9",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 1883,
        "graphics_card_id": 2154
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 58,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 48.435
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 195277329.308,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 474878412.32,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 365.509
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 4.989,
            "latency_ns": 220.376,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 30.981,
            "compute_gflops": 176.822,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 50.1
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.834,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 5.78290507,
        "gpu": 0.14735167,
        "memory": 0.30756136
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames",
        "gpu_vendor_mismatch"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 9,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 22,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 8,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 9,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 22,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 8,
        "performance_index": 7.89,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again