PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-3632QM + AMD Radeon HD 7630M browser benchmark
PC SCORE13OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 11 September 2026 · 15:35 EEST

Intel Core i7-3632QM+AMD Radeon HD 7630M

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:20
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU13

Processor throughput

Single thread
226.11 Mops/s
Multi thread
482.89 Mops/s
Compression proxy
301.9 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
121.5 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
44.8 FPS
Frame time p95
16.80 ms
MEMORY42

System memory

Effective bandwidth
11.97 GB/s
Latency proxy
70.6 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.49 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-3632QM comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
No sufficiently comparable desktop processors with complete specifications were found in this catalog generation.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon HD 7630M comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon R5 430 OEMArctic Islands(R5 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    +39.5%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon R7 430 OEMArctic Islands(R7 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    +39.5%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon R7 435 OEMArctic Islands(R7 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    +37.2%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon HD 7630MLondon(HD 7600M) · 1 GB VRAM · 2012
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

03 / STABILITY74.5%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW20 SEC DROPPED FRAMES25.54%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Fair · 73/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 19957,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-3632QM",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon HD 7630M",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1785,
        "graphics_card_id": 1573
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 20,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 25.538
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 226112254.98,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 482885784.327,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 301.898
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 11.969,
            "latency_ns": 70.572
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 44.754,
            "compute_gflops": 121.487,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.485,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 5.94172027,
        "gpu": 0.10123917
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 13,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 42,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 13,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 13,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 42,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 13,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again