Intel Core i7-1185G7

CPU category score 28/100 from the processor-only suite. This partial result is not a full-system PC Score.

SUITECPU + MEMORY MODESTRESS GPU APINOT RUN ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION01:31

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU28

Processor throughput

Single thread: 558.96 Mops/s
Multi thread: 1,738.36 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 761.6 MB/s

GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

This workload was not included in the CPU + Memory suite.

MEMORY82

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 28.85 GB/s
Latency proxy: 134.0 ns
Browser RAM class: 32 GB class

VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

This workload was not included in the CPU + Memory suite.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Tiger Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

Intel Core i9-11900HTiger Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021

+34.7%higher estimate
Intel Xeon W-11855MTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021

+20.1%higher estimate
Intel Core i5-11260HTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021

+7.8%higher estimate
Intel Core i7-1185G7Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2020

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
Intel Core i5-11320HTiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021

−6.3%lower estimate
Intel Core i3-1125G4Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021

−22.9%lower estimate
Intel Pentium Gold 7505Tiger Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2020

−44.7%lower estimate

03 / RUN QUALITY65.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW91 SEC RUN QUALITY65/100

Why the run quality was reduced

The run did not complete; the tab was hidden or a selected stage failed.

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: CPU + Memory
Platform family: Windows
Logical processors: 8
Browser RAM class: 32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API: NOT RUN
Browser: Edge 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution: 0.100 ms
Memory working set: 256 MB
Run quality: Fair · 65/100
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale: Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "cpu",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 90975,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-1185G7",
        "gpu_name": "intel iris(R) xe graphics",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "not_tested",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "processor_id": 1696
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 91,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 558958246.074,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1738355276.999,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 761.646
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 28.846,
            "latency_ns": 133.956,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 17.14077848,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 1.14537944
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "incomplete"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 28,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 82,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "grade": null
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 28,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 82,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "performance_index": null,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": null,
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same CPU + Memory suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again