PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-11800H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile browser benchmark
PC SCORE60OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEC
Excellent quality run 27 September 2026 · 08:57 EEST

Intel Core i7-11800H+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Solid performance with room to inspect individual workload results.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:55
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU100

Processor throughput

Single thread
1,317.90 Mops/s
Multi thread
11,145.23 Mops/s
Compression proxy
700.5 MB/s
GPU9

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
1,027.9 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
120.0 FPS
Frame time p95
8.34 ms
MEMORY88

System memory

Effective bandwidth
46.74 GB/s
Latency proxy
13.7 ns
Browser RAM class
— GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.49 GB/s
Tested allocation
256 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-11800H comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Tiger Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon W-11955MTiger Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    +8.7%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i9-11900HTiger Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    +6.5%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i7-11800HTiger Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. Intel Xeon W-11855MTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    −5.1%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core i5-11500HTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    −10.9%lower estimate
  6. Intel Core i3-1125G4Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021
    −39.0%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA RTX A2000 EmbeddedAmpere-MW(Ax000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +13.8%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA RTX A500 EmbeddedAmpere-MW(Ax000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +3.2%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +2.6%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti MobileGeForce 30 Mobile · 4 GB VRAM · 2021
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660GeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    −5.1%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPERGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    −5.1%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA RTX A1000 EmbeddedAmpere-MW(Ax000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −11.9%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY100.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW55 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.00%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Excellent · 100/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 55400,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-11800H",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1692,
        "graphics_card_id": 2541
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 55,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 1317902027.397,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 11145226612.683,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 700.503
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 46.735,
            "latency_ns": 13.727
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 119.971,
            "compute_gflops": 1027.908,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 8.34
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 256,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.492,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 49.95092763,
        "gpu": 0.85659
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 9,
        "memory": 88,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 60,
        "grade": "C"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 9,
        "memory": 88,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 60,
        "grade": "C",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again