PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-11700F + ANGLE (Microsoft, Microsoft Basic Render Driver (0x0000008C) Direct3D11 vs_5_0 ps_5_0, D3D11) browser benchmark
PC SCORE40OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 1 September 2026 · 06:32 EEST

Intel Core i7-11700F+ANGLE (Microsoft, Microsoft Basic Render Driver (0x0000008C) Direct3D11 vs_5_0 ps_5_0, D3D11)

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:49
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU63

Processor throughput

Single thread
647.02 Mops/s
Multi thread
5,326.15 Mops/s
Compression proxy
736.6 MB/s
GPU4

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
215.7 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
0.1 FPS
Frame time p95
0.00 ms
MEMORY69

System memory

Effective bandwidth
21.62 GB/s
Latency proxy
17.2 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-11700F comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Rocket Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i5-11600KRocket Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    +6.5%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i9-11900Rocket Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    +3.6%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i7-11700FRocket Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. Intel Core i5-11600Rocket Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    −7.9%lower estimate
  5. Intel Core i9-11900TRocket Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    −18.5%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

ANGLE (Microsoft, Microsoft Basic Render Driver (0x0000008C) Direct3D11 vs_5_0 ps_5_0, D3D11) comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no graphics-card catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

03 / STABILITY100.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW49 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.00%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Fair · 65/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 49340,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-11700F",
        "gpu_name": "ANGLE (Microsoft, Microsoft Basic Render Driver (0x0000008C) Direct3D11 vs_5_0 ps_5_0, D3D11)",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 1689
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 49,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 647020278.475,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 5326151051.693,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 736.562
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 21.615,
            "latency_ns": 17.175
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 0.055,
            "compute_gflops": 215.657,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 28.25186723,
        "gpu": 0.35942833
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 63,
        "gpu": 4,
        "memory": 69,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 40,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 63,
        "gpu": 4,
        "memory": 69,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 40,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again