PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i7-1165G7 + Iris Xe, 96 execution units browser benchmark
PC SCORE10OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 10 October 2026 · 04:16 EEST

Intel Core i7-1165G7+Iris Xe, 96 execution units

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION01:02
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU13

Processor throughput

Single thread
293.03 Mops/s
Multi thread
702.30 Mops/s
Compression proxy
382.4 MB/s
GPU2

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
501.1 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
8.0 FPS
Frame time p95
133.40 ms
MEMORY22

System memory

Effective bandwidth
6.94 GB/s
Latency proxy
418.6 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i7-1165G7 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Tiger Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-11900HTiger Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    +37.6%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xeon W-11855MTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    +22.6%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i5-11260HTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    +10.1%higher estimate
  4. Intel Core i7-1165G7Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. Intel Core i5-11320HTiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021
    −4.3%lower estimate
  6. Intel Core i3-1125G4Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021
    −21.3%lower estimate
  7. Intel Pentium Gold 7505Tiger Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2020
    −43.6%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

Iris Xe, 96 execution units comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no graphics-card catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

03 / STABILITY13.3%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW62 SEC DROPPED FRAMES86.69%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
  • The browser exposed fewer threads than the selected CPU has, so the multi-core test could not use all of them.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Linux
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Browser
Brave 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Fair · 60/100
Performance index
10.1 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 61829,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i7-1165G7",
        "gpu_name": "Iris Xe, 96 execution units",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "brave",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "processor_id": 1687
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 62,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 86.685
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 293032865.05,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 702302885.187,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 382.377
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 6.935,
            "latency_ns": 418.611,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 7.998,
            "compute_gflops": 501.102,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 133.4
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 8.02689186,
        "gpu": 0.83517,
        "memory": 0.30435258
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames",
        "thread_cap"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 13,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 22,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 10,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 13,
        "gpu": 2,
        "memory": 22,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 10,
        "performance_index": 10.08,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again