PC SCORE48OUT OF 100

SYSTEM GRADED

Limited quality run 21 October 2026 · 20:54 EEST

Intel Core i5-8500T+AMD Radeon RX 6600S

Capable performance; the category detail shows where this system is strongest.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIN/A ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:30

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU44

Processor throughput

Single thread: 848.81 Mops/s
Multi thread: 4,833.43 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 414.6 MB/s

GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

No completed GPU measurement was recorded for this run.

MEMORY57

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 13.89 GB/s
Latency proxy: 95.6 ns
Browser RAM class: — GB class

VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Coffee Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

Intel Core i9-9900TCoffee Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2019

+42.9%higher estimate
Intel Core i7-9700TCoffee Lake · 8 cores / 8 threads · 2019

+24.5%higher estimate
Intel Core i3-9100TCoffee Lake · 4 cores / 4 threads · 2019

+2.7%higher estimate
Intel Core i5-8500TCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 6 threads · 2018

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
Intel Core i5-9400TCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 6 threads · 2019

−7.6%lower estimate

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

AMD Radeon RX 6700Navi II(RX 6000) · 10 GB VRAM · 2021

+57.5%higher estimate
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2022

+50.5%higher estimate
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2021

+47.8%higher estimate
AMD Radeon RX 6600SNavi Mobile(RX 6000M) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
AMD Radeon RX 590Polaris(RX 500) · 8 GB VRAM · 2018

−0.7%lower estimate
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022

−19.7%lower estimate
AMD Radeon RX 6400Navi II(RX 6000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022

−50.3%lower estimate

03 / RUN QUALITY40.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW30 SEC RUN QUALITY40/100

Why the run quality was reduced

The run did not complete; the tab was hidden or a selected stage failed.
No GPU API was available in this browser.

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: Full system
Platform family: Windows
Logical processors: 6
Browser RAM class: Not disclosed
Graphics API: N/A
Browser: Firefox 158 · Gecko engine
Timer resolution: 1.000 ms
Memory working set: 256 MB
Run quality: Limited · 40/100
Performance index: 48.0 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard: Ranked
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale: Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 29766,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-8500T",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 6600S",
        "logical_cores": 6,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "unavailable",
        "browser_engine": "gecko",
        "browser_name": "firefox",
        "browser_version": 158,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": null,
        "processor_id": 1647,
        "graphics_card_id": 2658
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 30,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 848808061.626,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 4833429149.681,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 414.553
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 13.893,
            "latency_ns": 95.571,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 27.00316683,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 0.80174042
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "incomplete",
        "gpu_unavailable"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 44,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 57,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 48,
        "grade": "D"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 44,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 57,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 48,
        "performance_index": 47.95,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "D",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again