PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-8257U + NVIDIA GeForce MX110 browser benchmark
PC SCORE19OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 27 September 2026 · 15:12 EEST

Intel Core i5-8257U+NVIDIA GeForce MX110

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:57
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU28

Processor throughput

Single thread
391.77 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,375.44 Mops/s
Compression proxy
536.8 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
150.2 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
29.0 FPS
Frame time p95
17.00 ms
MEMORY40

System memory

Effective bandwidth
9.03 GB/s
Latency proxy
52.1 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.99 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-8257U comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Coffee Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-8950HKCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2018
    +78.3%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xeon E-2176MCoffee Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2018
    +64.4%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i7-8557UCoffee Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2019
    +17.8%higher estimate
  4. Intel Core i5-8257UCoffee Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. Intel Core i3-8109UCoffee Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2018
    −2.0%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    +117.3%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce 945MGeForce 900M · 1 GB VRAM · 2016
    +75.0%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce 930MXGeForce 900M · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    +50.0%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce MX110GeForce MX(1xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2017
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce 920MXGeForce 900M · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −1.9%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GT 710GeForce 700 · 1 GB VRAM · 2016
    −69.2%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY48.2%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW57 SEC DROPPED FRAMES51.80%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 57259,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-8257U",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce MX110",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1629,
        "graphics_card_id": 2187
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 57,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 51.795
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 391768744.329,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1375440854.281,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 536.771
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 9.025,
            "latency_ns": 52.11
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 28.953,
            "compute_gflops": 150.235,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 17
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.988,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 12.6246468,
        "gpu": 0.12519583
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 28,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 40,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 19,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 28,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 40,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 19,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again