PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-760 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 browser benchmark
PC SCORE14OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 6 September 2026 · 20:59 EEST

Intel Core i5-760+NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:42
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU16

Processor throughput

Single thread
230.89 Mops/s
Multi thread
732.04 Mops/s
Compression proxy
352.5 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
162.6 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
5.9 FPS
Frame time p95
683.30 ms
MEMORY42

System memory

Effective bandwidth
7.11 GB/s
Latency proxy
26.9 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.27 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-760 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
No sufficiently comparable desktop processors with complete specifications were found in this catalog generation.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce 945MGeForce 900M · 1 GB VRAM · 2016
    +468.8%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce 930MXGeForce 900M · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    +387.5%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce 920MXGeForce 900M · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    +218.8%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GT 710GeForce 700 · 1 GB VRAM · 2016
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

03 / STABILITY9.8%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW222 SEC DROPPED FRAMES90.22%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 222271,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-760",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GT 710",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1620,
        "graphics_card_id": 1829
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 222,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 90.222
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 230893181.08,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 732038098.769,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 352.458
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 7.108,
            "latency_ns": 26.862
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 5.868,
            "compute_gflops": 162.551,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 683.3
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.273,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 7.29914746,
        "gpu": 0.13545917
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 16,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 42,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 14,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 16,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 42,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 14,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again