PC SCORE10OUT OF 100

SYSTEM GRADEE

Excellent quality run 4 September 2026 · 19:47 EEST

Intel Core i5-6400+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:56

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU17

Processor throughput

Single thread: 339.22 Mops/s
Multi thread: 1,140.25 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 416.5 MB/s

GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work: 719.1 G shader ops/s
Render throughput: 50.5 FPS
Frame time p95: 33.40 ms

MEMORY12

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 14.14 GB/s
Latency proxy: 62.7 ns
Browser RAM class: 16 GB class

VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth: 2.19 GB/s
Tested allocation: 384 MB
Validation errors: 0 errors

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Skylake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

Intel Xeon W-3175XSkylake · 28 cores / 56 threads · 2018

+178.2%higher estimate
Intel Core i9-9820X X-seriesSkylake · 10 cores / 20 threads · 2018

+100.7%higher estimate
Intel Core i7-6785RSkylake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2016

+33.0%higher estimate
Intel Core i5-6400Skylake · 4 cores / 4 threads · 2015

BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GBGeForce 10 · 6 GB VRAM · 2016

+215.1%higher estimate
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce 10 · 4 GB VRAM · 2016

+54.0%higher estimate
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2016

+33.8%higher estimate
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce 700 · 2 GB VRAM · 2014

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
NVIDIA GeForce 945MGeForce 900M · 1 GB VRAM · 2016

−34.5%lower estimate
NVIDIA GeForce 930MXGeForce 900M · 2 GB VRAM · 2016

−43.9%lower estimate
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710GeForce 700 · 1 GB VRAM · 2016

−88.5%lower estimate

03 / STABILITY84.2%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW56 SEC DROPPED FRAMES15.84%

Why the run quality was reduced

Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: Full system
Platform family: Windows
Logical processors: 4
Browser RAM class: 16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API: WebGPU
Run quality: Excellent · 97/100
Performance index: 9.7 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard: Ranked
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale: Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
Original PC Score: 20/100 at run time

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 55678,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-6400",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1584,
        "graphics_card_id": 1839
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 56,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 15.838
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 339224940.52,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1140250573.895,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 416.537
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 14.144,
            "latency_ns": 62.671
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 50.476,
            "compute_gflops": 719.121,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 33.4
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.188,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 10.50990264,
        "gpu": 0.5992675,
        "memory": 0.94021926
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 23,
        "gpu": 6,
        "memory": 48,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 20,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 17,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 12,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 10,
        "performance_index": 9.71,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again