PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-6300U + AMD Radeon R7 M365X browser benchmark
PC SCORE12OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 5 October 2026 · 15:54 EEST

Intel Core i5-6300U+AMD Radeon R7 M365X

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:59
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU10

Processor throughput

Single thread
167.24 Mops/s
Multi thread
413.74 Mops/s
Compression proxy
202.0 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
102.6 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
16.4 FPS
Frame time p95
186.20 ms
MEMORY40

System memory

Effective bandwidth
12.44 GB/s
Latency proxy
90.5 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.16 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-6300U comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Skylake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon E3-1515M v5Skylake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2016
    +59.2%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7-6660USkylake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2016
    +7.8%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i5-6300USkylake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2015
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon R7 M365X comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon R5 M465Gem System(R5 M400) · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    +23.8%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon R5 M445Gem System(R5 M400) · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    +12.7%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon R5 435 OEMArctic Islands(R5 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    +4.8%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon R7 M365XGem System(R7 M300) · 1 GB VRAM · 2015
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon R5 430 OEMArctic Islands(R5 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −4.8%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon R7 430 OEMArctic Islands(R7 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −4.8%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon R7 435 OEMArctic Islands(R7 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −6.3%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY27.3%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW59 SEC DROPPED FRAMES72.68%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 58923,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-6300U",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon R7 M365X",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1581,
        "graphics_card_id": 2035
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 59,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 72.679
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 167237657.529,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 413736994.213,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 202.009
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 12.437,
            "latency_ns": 90.452
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 16.407,
            "compute_gflops": 102.601,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 186.2
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.161,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 4.56846458,
        "gpu": 0.08550083
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 10,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 40,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 12,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 10,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 40,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 12,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again