PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-2500S + AMD Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition browser benchmark
PC SCORE14OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 15 September 2026 · 15:24 EEST

Intel Core i5-2500S+AMD Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:08
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU17

Processor throughput

Single thread
273.28 Mops/s
Multi thread
736.45 Mops/s
Compression proxy
291.9 MB/s
GPU0

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
14.8 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
5.0 FPS
Frame time p95
333.97 ms
MEMORY42

System memory

Effective bandwidth
11.41 GB/s
Latency proxy
65.2 ns
Browser RAM class
4 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-2500S comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
No sufficiently comparable desktop processors with complete specifications were found in this catalog generation.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon R5 M465Gem System(R5 M400) · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    +20.0%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon R5 M445Gem System(R5 M400) · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    +9.2%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon R5 435 OEMArctic Islands(R5 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    +1.5%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon HD 6770M Mac EditionVancouver(HD 6700M) · 1 GB VRAM · 2011
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon R5 430 OEMArctic Islands(R5 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −7.7%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon R7 430 OEMArctic Islands(R7 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −7.7%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon R7 435 OEMArctic Islands(R7 400) · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −9.2%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY8.3%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW188 SEC DROPPED FRAMES91.75%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
4 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Limited · 32/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 187518,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-2500S",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 4,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 1458,
        "graphics_card_id": 1426
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 188,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 91.748
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 273280552.273,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 736450074.204,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 291.947
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 11.408,
            "latency_ns": 65.241
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 4.953,
            "compute_gflops": 14.763,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 333.966
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 7.53762217,
        "gpu": 0.024605
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 17,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 42,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 14,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 17,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 42,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 14,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again