PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 7600 browser benchmark
PC SCORE72OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEB
Good quality run 27 September 2026 · 00:08 EEST

Intel Core i5-14600K+AMD Radeon RX 7600

Very good performance for demanding everyday and creative workloads.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:19
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU69

Processor throughput

Single thread
688.89 Mops/s
Multi thread
6,452.61 Mops/s
Compression proxy
735.1 MB/s
GPU65

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
7,827.1 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
145.8 FPS
Frame time p95
6.20 ms
MEMORY93

System memory

Effective bandwidth
58.19 GB/s
Latency proxy
20.7 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
3.12 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-14600K comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Raptor Lake Refresh desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-14900KRaptor Lake Refresh · 24 cores / 32 threads · 2023
    +27.6%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7-14700KRaptor Lake Refresh · 20 cores / 28 threads · 2023
    +17.5%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i5-14600KRaptor Lake Refresh · 14 cores / 20 threads · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 7600 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 7700Navi III(RX 7000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +22.4%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 7600 XTNavi III(RX 7000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2024
    +3.8%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRENavi III(RX 7000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    +1.5%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 7600Navi III(RX 7000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 9060Navi IV(RX 9000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    −1.5%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 7400Navi III(RX 7000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    −24.2%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 6750 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 12 GB VRAM · 2022
    −38.8%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY96.3%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW19 SEC DROPPED FRAMES3.74%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 89/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 19237,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-14600K",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 7600",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 27,
        "graphics_card_id": 68
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 19,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 3.742
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 688885591.283,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 6452605664.753,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 735.108
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 58.192,
            "latency_ns": 20.679
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 145.771,
            "compute_gflops": 7827.141,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 6.2
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 3.115,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 31.26769496,
        "gpu": 6.5226175
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 69,
        "gpu": 65,
        "memory": 93,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 72,
        "grade": "B"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 69,
        "gpu": 65,
        "memory": 93,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 72,
        "grade": "B",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again