PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-13450HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile browser benchmark
PC SCORE9OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 9 September 2026 · 02:44 EEST

Intel Core i5-13450HX+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION01:27
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU2

Processor throughput

Single thread
28.96 Mops/s
Multi thread
247.23 Mops/s
Compression proxy
11.3 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
87.2 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
0.0 FPS
Frame time p95
0.00 ms
MEMORY45

System memory

Effective bandwidth
14.47 GB/s
Latency proxy
79.7 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-13450HX comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Raptor Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-13900HRaptor Lake · 14 cores / 20 threads · 2023
    +31.9%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7-1355URaptor Lake · 10 cores / 12 threads · 2023
    +4.1%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i5-13450HXRaptor Lake · 10 cores / 16 threads · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. Intel Core i3-1315URaptor Lake · 6 cores / 8 threads · 2023
    −22.5%lower estimate
  5. Intel Processor U300Raptor Lake · 5 cores / 6 threads · 2023
    −30.6%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GBGeForce 40 · 16 GB VRAM · 2023
    +187.2%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060GeForce 50 · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    +149.7%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060GeForce 40 · 8 GB VRAM · 2023
    +96.7%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 MobileGeForce 50 Mobile · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070GeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2018
    −2.9%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPERGeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    −6.5%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010GeForce 40 · 4 GB VRAM · 2024
    −64.7%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY100.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW87 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.00%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Fair · 65/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 86835,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-13450HX",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 1424,
        "graphics_card_id": 2799
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 87,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 28958980.892,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 247231014.131,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 11.272
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 14.466,
            "latency_ns": 79.686
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 0.017,
            "compute_gflops": 87.172,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 1.03520755,
        "gpu": 0.14528667
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 2,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 45,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 9,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 2,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 45,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 9,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again