PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-1335U + Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile browser benchmark
PC SCORE37OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 23 September 2026 · 20:03 EEST

Intel Core i5-1335U+Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:48
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU51

Processor throughput

Single thread
668.23 Mops/s
Multi thread
3,185.19 Mops/s
Compression proxy
712.8 MB/s
GPU13

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
781.6 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
8.2 FPS
Frame time p95
83.30 ms
MEMORY63

System memory

Effective bandwidth
21.07 GB/s
Latency proxy
39.6 ns
Browser RAM class
— GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-1335U comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Raptor Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-13900HRaptor Lake · 14 cores / 20 threads · 2023
    +37.7%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7-1355URaptor Lake · 10 cores / 12 threads · 2023
    +8.7%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i5-1335URaptor Lake · 10 cores / 12 threads · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. Intel Core i3-1315URaptor Lake · 6 cores / 8 threads · 2023
    −19.1%lower estimate
  5. Intel Processor U300Raptor Lake · 5 cores / 6 threads · 2023
    −27.5%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. Intel Arc Pro A40Alchemist(Pro Series) · 6 GB VRAM · 2022
    +87.1%higher estimate
  2. Intel Arc A350Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +65.1%higher estimate
  3. Intel Arc A310Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +44.6%higher estimate
  4. Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU MobileHD Graphics-M(Raptor Lake) · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. Intel H3C XG310H3C Graphics · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    −9.1%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY13.6%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW48 SEC DROPPED FRAMES86.45%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Limited · 40/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 48145,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-1335U",
        "gpu_name": "Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 1415,
        "graphics_card_id": 2678
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 48,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 86.447
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 668227064.665,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 3185192136.003,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 712.789
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 21.071,
            "latency_ns": 39.588
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 8.16,
            "compute_gflops": 781.594,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 83.3
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 23.14668612,
        "gpu": 1.30265667
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 51,
        "gpu": 13,
        "memory": 63,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 37,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 51,
        "gpu": 13,
        "memory": 63,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 37,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again