PC SCORE73OUT OF 100

SYSTEM GRADEB

Good quality run 12 September 2026 · 20:02 EEST

Intel Core i5-1334U+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Very good performance for demanding everyday and creative workloads.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:57

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU81

Processor throughput

Single thread: 824.29 Mops/s
Multi thread: 7,365.83 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 832.0 MB/s

GPU57

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work: 6,790.5 G shader ops/s
Render throughput: 51.6 FPS
Frame time p95: 16.80 ms

MEMORY91

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 54.01 GB/s
Latency proxy: 13.2 ns
Browser RAM class: 16 GB class

VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth: 1.76 GB/s
Tested allocation: 384 MB
Validation errors: 0 errors

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Raptor Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

Intel Core i9-13900HRaptor Lake · 14 cores / 20 threads · 2023

+37.7%higher estimate
Intel Core i7-1355URaptor Lake · 10 cores / 12 threads · 2023

+8.7%higher estimate
Intel Core i5-1334URaptor Lake · 10 cores / 12 threads · 2023

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
Intel Core i3-1315URaptor Lake · 6 cores / 8 threads · 2023

−19.1%lower estimate
Intel Processor U300Raptor Lake · 5 cores / 6 threads · 2023

−27.5%lower estimate

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070GeForce 50 · 12 GB VRAM · 2025

+134.4%higher estimate
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GBGeForce 50 · 16 GB VRAM · 2025

+80.0%higher estimate
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060GeForce 50 · 8 GB VRAM · 2025

+45.6%higher estimate
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050GeForce 50 · 8 GB VRAM · 2025

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12 GBGeForce 30 · 12 GB VRAM · 2021

−3.3%lower estimate
NVIDIA TITAN XpGeForce 10 · 12 GB VRAM · 2017

−7.7%lower estimate
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010GeForce 40 · 4 GB VRAM · 2024

−79.4%lower estimate

03 / STABILITY85.8%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW57 SEC DROPPED FRAMES14.15%

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: Full system
Platform family: Windows
Logical processors: 16
Browser RAM class: 16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API: WebGPU
Run quality: Good · 89/100
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale: Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 56576,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-1334U",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1414,
        "graphics_card_id": 2798
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 57,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 14.154
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 824291509.289,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 7365831066.63,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 831.954
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 54.011,
            "latency_ns": 13.185
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 51.553,
            "compute_gflops": 6790.47,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.759,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 36.30894592,
        "gpu": 5.658725
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 81,
        "gpu": 57,
        "memory": 91,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 73,
        "grade": "B"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 81,
        "gpu": 57,
        "memory": 91,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 73,
        "grade": "B",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again