PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT browser benchmark
PC SCORE61OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEC
Good quality run 8 September 2026 · 13:46 EEST

Intel Core i5-12400+AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Solid performance with room to inspect individual workload results.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:56
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU62

Processor throughput

Single thread
704.98 Mops/s
Multi thread
4,887.38 Mops/s
Compression proxy
719.8 MB/s
GPU48

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
5,803.9 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
22.8 FPS
Frame time p95
48.90 ms
MEMORY87

System memory

Effective bandwidth
46.30 GB/s
Latency proxy
15.9 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
2.10 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-12400 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Alder Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-12900TAlder Lake · 16 cores / 24 threads · 2022
    +19.2%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7-12700TAlder Lake · 12 cores / 20 threads · 2022
    +5.4%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i5-12400Alder Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2022
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. Intel Core i3-12300Alder Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2022
    −2.7%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 6800 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2020
    +57.0%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 6800Navi II(RX 6000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2020
    +22.4%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 6750 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 12 GB VRAM · 2022
    +0.8%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 6700 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 12 GB VRAM · 2021
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 6700Navi II(RX 6000) · 10 GB VRAM · 2021
    −14.5%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 6650 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2022
    −18.3%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 6600 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2021
    −19.8%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY36.2%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW56 SEC DROPPED FRAMES63.85%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 55947,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-12400",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1390,
        "graphics_card_id": 60
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 56,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 63.85
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 704984120.97,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 4887378148.002,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 719.82
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 46.298,
            "latency_ns": 15.909
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 22.849,
            "compute_gflops": 5803.949,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 48.9
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.101,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 28.12027989,
        "gpu": 4.83662417
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 62,
        "gpu": 48,
        "memory": 87,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 61,
        "grade": "C"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 62,
        "gpu": 48,
        "memory": 87,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 61,
        "grade": "C",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again