PC SCORE22OUT OF 100

SYSTEM GRADEE

Limited quality run 8 September 2026 · 16:17 EEST

Intel Core i5-1145G7+Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:39

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU29

Processor throughput

Single thread: 430.47 Mops/s
Multi thread: 1,310.30 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 538.9 MB/s

GPU5

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work: 601.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput: 32.8 FPS
Frame time p95: 50.40 ms

MEMORY44

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 9.38 GB/s
Latency proxy: 40.6 ns
Browser RAM class: 16 GB class

VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth: 0.52 GB/s
Tested allocation: 512 MB
Validation errors: 0 errors

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Tiger Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

Intel Core i9-11900HTiger Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021

+46.9%higher estimate
Intel Xeon W-11855MTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021

+31.0%higher estimate
Intel Core i7-1180G7Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021

+4.5%higher estimate
Intel Core i5-1145G7Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
Intel Core i3-1125G4Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021

−15.9%lower estimate
Intel Pentium Gold 7505Tiger Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2020

−39.7%lower estimate

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

Intel Arc Pro A40Alchemist(Pro Series) · 6 GB VRAM · 2022

+37.5%higher estimate
Intel Arc A350Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022

+21.3%higher estimate
Intel Arc A310Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022

+6.3%higher estimate
Intel Iris Xe MAX GraphicsXe Graphics · 4 GB VRAM · 2020

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
Intel Xe DG1Xe Graphics · 4 GB VRAM · 2020

−21.7%lower estimate
Intel H3C XG310H3C Graphics · 8 GB VRAM · 2020

−33.2%lower estimate

03 / STABILITY54.6%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW219 SEC DROPPED FRAMES45.37%

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: Full system
Platform family: Windows
Logical processors: 8
Browser RAM class: 16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API: WebGPU
Run quality: Limited · 40/100
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale: Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 219474,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-1145G7",
        "gpu_name": "Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1376,
        "graphics_card_id": 2508
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 219,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 45.373
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 430467525.136,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1310303551.954,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 538.934
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 9.384,
            "latency_ns": 40.558
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 32.787,
            "compute_gflops": 601.414,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 50.4
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.521,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 12.86781438,
        "gpu": 0.50117833
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 29,
        "gpu": 5,
        "memory": 44,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 22,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 29,
        "gpu": 5,
        "memory": 44,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 22,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again