PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-1135G7 + Xe Graphics browser benchmark
PC SCORE10OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 29 August 2026 · 13:04 EEST

Intel Core i5-1135G7+Xe Graphics

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:22
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU15

Processor throughput

Single thread
247.96 Mops/s
Multi thread
577.63 Mops/s
Compression proxy
324.2 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
160.7 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
28.5 FPS
Frame time p95
116.70 ms
MEMORY21

System memory

Effective bandwidth
6.29 GB/s
Latency proxy
110.6 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.42 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-1135G7 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Tiger Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-11900HTiger Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    +53.9%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xeon W-11855MTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    +37.2%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i7-1160G7Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    +4.8%higher estimate
  4. Intel Core i5-1135G7Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. Intel Core i3-1125G4Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021
    −11.9%lower estimate
  6. Intel Pentium Gold 7505Tiger Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2020
    −36.8%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

Xe Graphics comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no graphics-card catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

03 / STABILITY47.5%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW22 SEC DROPPED FRAMES52.48%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Fair · 67/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 22292,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-1135G7",
        "gpu_name": "Xe Graphics",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1371
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 22,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 52.484
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 247964638.181,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 577630776.225,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 324.242
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 6.287,
            "latency_ns": 110.576
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 28.526,
            "compute_gflops": 160.725,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 116.7
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.424,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 6.71835008,
        "gpu": 0.1339375
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 15,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 21,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 10,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 15,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 21,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 10,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again