PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-1135G7 + Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile browser benchmark
PC SCORE8OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 6 October 2026 · 09:28 EEST

Intel Core i5-1135G7+Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION03:42
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU9

Processor throughput

Single thread
177.55 Mops/s
Multi thread
554.59 Mops/s
Compression proxy
274.0 MB/s
GPU0

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
82.5 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
5.9 FPS
Frame time p95
333.40 ms
MEMORY26

System memory

Effective bandwidth
5.95 GB/s
Latency proxy
197.9 ns
Browser RAM class
4 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.67 GB/s
Tested allocation
192 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-1135G7 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Tiger Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-11900HTiger Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    +53.9%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xeon W-11855MTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    +37.2%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i7-1160G7Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    +4.8%higher estimate
  4. Intel Core i5-1135G7Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. Intel Core i3-1125G4Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021
    −11.9%lower estimate
  6. Intel Pentium Gold 7505Tiger Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2020
    −36.8%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. Intel Arc A310Alchemist(Arc 3) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +220.2%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xe DG1Xe Graphics · 4 GB VRAM · 2020
    +135.7%higher estimate
  3. Intel H3C XG310H3C Graphics · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    +101.2%higher estimate
  4. Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU MobileHD Graphics-M(Tiger Lake) · 2020
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

03 / STABILITY9.8%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW222 SEC DROPPED FRAMES90.24%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
  • The laptop ran on battery, which usually lowers performance.
  • The browser ran the GPU test on a different adapter than the selected graphics card, often the integrated GPU.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Android
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
4 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Chrome 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
64 MB
Run quality
Limited · 25/100
Performance index
8.3 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Not ranked: far from the median of this hardware
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 221683,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-1135G7",
        "gpu_name": "Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 4,
        "platform": "android",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "chrome",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": true,
        "gpu_vendor": "qualcomm",
        "gpu_architecture": "adreno-6xx",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 1371,
        "graphics_card_id": 2505
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 222,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 90.243
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 177551316.513,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 554589090.442,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 273.997
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 5.954,
            "latency_ns": 197.947,
            "working_set_mb": 64
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 5.854,
            "compute_gflops": 82.464,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 333.4
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 192,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.671,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 5.5916502,
        "gpu": 0.06872,
        "memory": 0.35823179
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames",
        "on_battery",
        "gpu_vendor_mismatch"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 9,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 26,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 8,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 9,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 26,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 8,
        "performance_index": 8.33,
        "leaderboard_outlier": true,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again