PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-11260H + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 browser benchmark
PC SCORE15OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 14 October 2026 · 04:11 EEST

Intel Core i5-11260H+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION03:48
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU21

Processor throughput

Single thread
364.32 Mops/s
Multi thread
2,078.61 Mops/s
Compression proxy
308.2 MB/s
GPU0

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
138.5 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
10.4 FPS
Frame time p95
966.20 ms
MEMORY38

System memory

Effective bandwidth
10.83 GB/s
Latency proxy
188.3 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.20 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-11260H comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Tiger Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-11900HTiger Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2021
    +24.9%higher estimate
  2. Intel Xeon W-11855MTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    +11.4%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i7-11600HTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    +4.5%higher estimate
  4. Intel Core i5-11260HTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. Intel Core i7-11375HTiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021
    −3.4%lower estimate
  6. Intel Core i3-1125G4Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021
    −28.5%lower estimate
  7. Intel Pentium Gold 7505Tiger Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2020
    −48.7%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660GeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +68.8%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPERGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    +68.8%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    +48.3%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10GbpsGeForce MX(4xx) · 2 GB VRAM · 2020
    −5.4%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA P106-090Mining GPUs · 3 GB VRAM · 2017
    −21.1%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630GeForce 16 · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −38.6%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY17.4%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW228 SEC DROPPED FRAMES82.61%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
  • The laptop ran on battery, which usually lowers performance.
  • The browser ran the GPU test on a different adapter than the selected graphics card, often the integrated GPU.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Edge 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Limited · 25/100
Performance index
15.6 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Not ranked: far from the median of this hardware
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 227508,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-11260H",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": true,
        "gpu_vendor": "intel",
        "gpu_architecture": "gen-12lp",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 1367,
        "graphics_card_id": 11
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 228,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 82.614
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 364321376.868,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 2078608548.584,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 308.245
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 10.828,
            "latency_ns": 188.335,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 10.438,
            "compute_gflops": 138.493,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 966.2
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.196,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 12.94657524,
        "gpu": 0.11541083,
        "memory": 0.53772596
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames",
        "on_battery",
        "gpu_vendor_mismatch"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 21,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 38,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 15,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 21,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 38,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 15,
        "performance_index": 15.57,
        "leaderboard_outlier": true,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again