PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i5-1035G1 + INTEL uhd browser benchmark
PC SCORE17OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 20 September 2026 · 17:29 EEST

Intel Core i5-1035G1+INTEL uhd

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:57
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU21

Processor throughput

Single thread
290.42 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,067.10 Mops/s
Compression proxy
355.6 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
155.8 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
22.0 FPS
Frame time p95
449.30 ms
MEMORY46

System memory

Effective bandwidth
17.08 GB/s
Latency proxy
96.6 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.69 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i5-1035G1 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Ice Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i7-1065G7Ice Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2019
    +16.5%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i5-1035G1Ice Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. Intel Core i3-1005G1Ice Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2019
    −21.2%lower estimate
  4. Intel Pentium 6805Ice Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2020
    −29.4%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

INTEL uhd comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no graphics-card catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

03 / STABILITY36.6%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW57 SEC DROPPED FRAMES63.41%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 57090,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i5-1035G1",
        "gpu_name": "INTEL uhd",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1352
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 57,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 63.41
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 290415603.969,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1067103030.929,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 355.612
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 17.08,
            "latency_ns": 96.643
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 21.994,
            "compute_gflops": 155.762,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 449.3
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.693,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 9.31876904,
        "gpu": 0.12980167
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 21,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 46,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 17,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 21,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 46,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 17,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again