PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i3-7020U + AMD Radeon Pro V520 browser benchmark
PC SCORE7OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 2 September 2026 · 13:42 EEST

Intel Core i3-7020U+AMD Radeon Pro V520

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION01:02
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU9

Processor throughput

Single thread
137.63 Mops/s
Multi thread
387.68 Mops/s
Compression proxy
177.4 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
129.9 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
13.2 FPS
Frame time p95
649.80 ms
MEMORY16

System memory

Effective bandwidth
5.16 GB/s
Latency proxy
118.4 ns
Browser RAM class
4 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.72 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i3-7020U comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
The catalog does not contain enough core and clock data to build a responsible CPU estimate for this model.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon Pro V520 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 5700 XTNavi(RX 5000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    +32.3%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 6600Navi II(RX 6000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2021
    +21.2%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 5700Navi(RX 5000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    +7.9%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon Pro V520Radeon Pro Navi(Navi Series) · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 5600 XTNavi(RX 5000) · 6 GB VRAM · 2020
    −2.4%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 590Polaris(RX 500) · 8 GB VRAM · 2018
    −3.4%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 6500 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −21.8%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY22.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW62 SEC DROPPED FRAMES78.03%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
4 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 61541,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i3-7020U",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon Pro V520",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 4,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 1305,
        "graphics_card_id": 2491
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 62,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 78.031
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 137630639.362,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 387682190.172,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 177.364
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 5.159,
            "latency_ns": 118.426
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 13.192,
            "compute_gflops": 129.871,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 649.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.717,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 4.01164258,
        "gpu": 0.10822583
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 9,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 16,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 7,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 9,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 16,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 7,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again