PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i3-1120G4 CPU browser benchmark
CPU CATEGORY SCORE20PARTIAL · OUT OF 100
RUN QUALITY90
Excellent quality run 7 October 2026 · 05:58 EEST

Intel Core i3-1120G4

CPU category score 20/100 from the processor-only suite. This partial result is not a full-system PC Score.

SUITECPU + MEMORY MODESTANDARD GPU APINOT RUN ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:28
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU20

Processor throughput

Single thread
369.45 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,811.75 Mops/s
Compression proxy
274.8 MB/s
GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

This workload was not included in the CPU + Memory suite.

MEMORY30

System memory

Effective bandwidth
8.72 GB/s
Latency proxy
250.6 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

This workload was not included in the CPU + Memory suite.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i3-1120G4 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Tiger Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Xeon W-11855MTiger Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    +64.7%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i7-1160G7Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    +25.7%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i5-1130G7Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    +14.3%higher estimate
  4. Intel Core i3-1120G4Tiger Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2021
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. Intel Pentium Gold 7505Tiger Lake · 2 cores / 4 threads · 2020
    −24.2%lower estimate
03 / RUN QUALITY90.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW28 SEC RUN QUALITY90/100

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The laptop ran on battery, which usually lowers performance.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
CPU + Memory
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
NOT RUN
Browser
Edge 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Excellent · 90/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "cpu",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 27512,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i3-1120G4",
        "gpu_name": "Intel UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "not_tested",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": true,
        "processor_id": 1168,
        "graphics_card_id": 2511
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 28,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 369446697.923,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1811745737.854,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 274.797
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 8.723,
            "latency_ns": 250.569,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 12.043002,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 0.42280367
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "on_battery"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 20,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 30,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "grade": null
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 20,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 30,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "performance_index": null,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": null,
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same CPU + Memory suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again