PCBenchmark/Results/Intel Core i3-10100 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 browser benchmark
PC SCORE9OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 12 October 2026 · 19:10 EEST

Intel Core i3-10100+AMD Radeon RX 9070

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION01:05
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU14

Processor throughput

Single thread
411.06 Mops/s
Multi thread
740.43 Mops/s
Compression proxy
236.2 MB/s
GPU0

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
68.0 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
4.7 FPS
Frame time p95
857.58 ms
MEMORY16

System memory

Effective bandwidth
3.32 GB/s
Latency proxy
257.8 ns
Browser RAM class
— GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.20 GB/s
Tested allocation
256 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

Intel Core i3-10100 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Comet Lake desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. Intel Core i9-10900TComet Lake · 10 cores / 20 threads · 2020
    +16.3%higher estimate
  2. Intel Core i5-10400Comet Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2020
    +7.9%higher estimate
  3. Intel Core i7-10700TComet Lake · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2020
    +7.2%higher estimate
  4. Intel Core i3-10100Comet Lake · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. Intel Core i5-10600TComet Lake · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2020
    −4.2%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 9070 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XTNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +34.7%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRENavi III(RX 7000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2024
    +27.3%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 7800 XTNavi III(RX 7000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2023
    +3.3%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 9070Navi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −5.1%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −29.0%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 9060Navi IV(RX 9000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    −40.7%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY7.9%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW65 SEC DROPPED FRAMES92.15%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
  • The browser exposed fewer threads than the selected CPU has, so the multi-core test could not use all of them.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
2
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Firefox 157 · Gecko engine
Timer resolution
1.000 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Fair · 60/100
Performance index
8.6 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Not ranked: far from the median of this hardware
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 65093,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "Intel Core i3-10100",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 9070",
        "logical_cores": 2,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "gecko",
        "browser_name": "firefox",
        "browser_version": 157,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": null,
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 11,
        "graphics_card_id": 74
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 65,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 92.145
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 411058849.315,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 740425241.012,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 236.213
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 3.319,
            "latency_ns": 257.833,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 4.72,
            "compute_gflops": 67.984,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 857.58
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 256,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.204,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 8.52486661,
        "gpu": 0.05665333,
        "memory": 0.22336583
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames",
        "thread_cap"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 14,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 16,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 9,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 14,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 16,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 9,
        "performance_index": 8.58,
        "leaderboard_outlier": true,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again