PCBenchmark/Results/i7-4790k + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti browser benchmark
PC SCORE16OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Excellent quality run 9 October 2026 · 01:37 EEST

i7-4790k+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION03:39
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU17

Processor throughput

Single thread
329.43 Mops/s
Multi thread
1,385.69 Mops/s
Compression proxy
260.5 MB/s
GPU8

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
4,362.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
78.1 FPS
Frame time p95
10.10 ms
MEMORY33

System memory

Effective bandwidth
6.90 GB/s
Latency proxy
129.0 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.33 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

i7-4790k comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
This report has no processor catalog match, so PCBenchmark will not infer a performance tier from its name.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 TiGeForce 10 · 11 GB VRAM · 2017
    +38.5%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA TITAN X PascalGeForce 10 · 12 GB VRAM · 2016
    +33.9%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    +8.3%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2017
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    −21.1%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GBGeForce 10 · 6 GB VRAM · 2016
    −46.5%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce 10 · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    −73.9%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY86.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW219 SEC DROPPED FRAMES14.01%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Edge 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Excellent · 98/100
Performance index
16.1 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 218920,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "i7-4790k",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "nvidia",
        "gpu_architecture": "pascal",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "graphics_card_id": 2184
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 219,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 14.006
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 329428716.209,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1385690212.289,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 260.54
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 6.899,
            "latency_ns": 129.02,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 78.077,
            "compute_gflops": 4362.38,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 10.1
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.33,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 10.22394888,
        "gpu": 3.63531667,
        "memory": 0.45794311
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 17,
        "gpu": 8,
        "memory": 33,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 16,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 17,
        "gpu": 8,
        "memory": 33,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 16,
        "performance_index": 16.1,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again