PCBenchmark BETA
EN
EnglishEN RomânăRO DeutschDE FrançaisFR EspañolES PortuguêsPT ItalianoIT PolskiPL
Start PC stress test
PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme + AMD Radeon 780M browser benchmark
PC SCORE47OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADED
Good quality run 11 September 2026 · 17:46 EEST

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme+AMD Radeon 780M

Capable performance; the category detail shows where this system is strongest.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:55
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU62

Processor throughput

Single thread
677.66 Mops/s
Multi thread
4,613.26 Mops/s
Compression proxy
821.8 MB/s
GPU17

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
2,016.8 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
78.2 FPS
Frame time p95
25.30 ms
MEMORY81

System memory

Effective bandwidth
34.42 GB/s
Latency proxy
17.4 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
2.70 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
No sufficiently comparable desktop processors with complete specifications were found in this catalog generation.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon 780M comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 6750 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 12 GB VRAM · 2022
    +49.4%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GBNavi II(RX 6000) · 12 GB VRAM · 2023
    +48.3%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 6650 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2022
    +21.1%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon 780MNavi III IGP(Phoenix) · 2024
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon Instinct MI8Radeon Instinct(MIx) · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    −8.1%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 6500 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −35.4%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 6400Navi II(RX 6000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    −60.0%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY85.6%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW55 SEC DROPPED FRAMES14.37%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 89/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON + 
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 55196,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon 780M",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 710,
        "graphics_card_id": 113
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 55,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 14.372
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 677660820.902,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 4613264261.773,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 821.78
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 34.421,
            "latency_ns": 17.376
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 78.242,
            "compute_gflops": 2016.825,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 25.3
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.699,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 27.77359792,
        "gpu": 1.6806875
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 62,
        "gpu": 17,
        "memory": 81,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 47,
        "grade": "D"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 62,
        "gpu": 17,
        "memory": 81,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 47,
        "grade": "D",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again