PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell browser benchmark
PC SCORE100OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADES+
Excellent quality run 18 August 2026 · 09:35 EEST

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D+NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Exceptional browser-level performance across the workloads measured in this suite.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:19
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU100

Processor throughput

Single thread
943.57 Mops/s
Multi thread
15,544.60 Mops/s
Compression proxy
1,224.8 MB/s
GPU100

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
23,078.7 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
58.9 FPS
Frame time p95
17.00 ms
MEMORY100

System memory

Effective bandwidth
101.66 GB/s
Latency proxy
8.3 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.15 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 5 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

No faster peer is available in this comparison set.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3DZen 5 · 16 cores / 32 threads · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  2. AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3DZen 5 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2026
    −22.3%lower estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 5 9600XZen 5 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2024
    −37.1%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

No faster peer is available in this comparison set.

  1. NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 BlackwellBlackwell PRO W(x000) · 96 GB VRAM · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090GeForce 50 · 32 GB VRAM · 2025
    −16.8%lower estimate
  3. NVIDIA RTX 6000DBlackwell PRO W(x000) · 84 GB VRAM · 2025
    −23.0%lower estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080GeForce 50 · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −55.3%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY98.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW19 SEC DROPPED FRAMES1.97%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
20
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Excellent · 91/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 18663,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell",
        "logical_cores": 20,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 71,
        "graphics_card_id": 2818
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 19,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 1.967
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 943572028.716,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 15544602410.105,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1224.75
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 101.655,
            "latency_ns": 8.301
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 58.89,
            "compute_gflops": 23078.686,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 17
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.148,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 55.82440545,
        "gpu": 19.23223833
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 100,
        "memory": 100,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 100,
        "grade": "S+"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 100,
        "memory": 100,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 100,
        "grade": "S+",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again