PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti browser benchmark
PC SCORE39OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 7 October 2026 · 19:48 EEST

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION03:40
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU54

Processor throughput

Single thread
822.45 Mops/s
Multi thread
5,442.45 Mops/s
Compression proxy
1,010.5 MB/s
GPU0

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
254.2 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
12.5 FPS
Frame time p95
291.50 ms
MEMORY97

System memory

Effective bandwidth
34.77 GB/s
Latency proxy
117.0 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
2.27 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 5 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

No faster peer is available in this comparison set.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3DZen 5 · 16 cores / 32 threads · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  2. AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3DZen 5 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2026
    −22.3%lower estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 5 9600XZen 5 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2024
    −37.1%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090GeForce 50 · 32 GB VRAM · 2025
    +138.5%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080GeForce 50 · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +28.1%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPERGeForce 40 · 16 GB VRAM · 2024
    +18.8%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 TiGeForce 50 · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070GeForce 50 · 12 GB VRAM · 2025
    −29.7%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GBGeForce 50 · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −46.1%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060GeForce 50 · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    −56.3%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY19.4%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW220 SEC DROPPED FRAMES80.60%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
  • The browser ran the GPU test on a different adapter than the selected graphics card, often the integrated GPU.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
32
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Edge 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Limited · 35/100
Performance index
39.7 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Not ranked: far from the median of this hardware
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 220214,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti",
        "logical_cores": 32,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "amd",
        "gpu_architecture": "rdna-2",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 71,
        "graphics_card_id": 38
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 220,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 80.604
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 822448186.5,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 5442454386.008,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1010.514
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 34.768,
            "latency_ns": 117.019,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 12.478,
            "compute_gflops": 254.212,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 291.5
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.273,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 33.41508354,
        "gpu": 0.21184333,
        "memory": 1.35583731
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames",
        "gpu_vendor_mismatch"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 54,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 97,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 39,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 54,
        "gpu": 0,
        "memory": 97,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 39,
        "performance_index": 39.69,
        "leaderboard_outlier": true,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again