PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 9 9950X CPU browser benchmark
CPU CATEGORY SCORE100PARTIAL · OUT OF 100
RUN QUALITY77
Good quality run 6 October 2026 · 00:01 EEST

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

CPU category score 100/100 from the processor-only suite. This partial result is not a full-system PC Score.

SUITECPU + MEMORY MODEQUICK GPU APINOT RUN ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:09
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU100

Processor throughput

Single thread
1,720.98 Mops/s
Multi thread
24,604.88 Mops/s
Compression proxy
1,158.6 MB/s
GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

This workload was not included in the CPU + Memory suite.

MEMORY100

System memory

Effective bandwidth
159.19 GB/s
Latency proxy
8.2 ns
Browser RAM class
— GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

This workload was not included in the CPU + Memory suite.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 5 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

No faster peer is available in this comparison set.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 9950XZen 5 · 16 cores / 32 threads · 2024
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  2. AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3DZen 5 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2026
    −22.3%lower estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 5 9600XZen 5 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2024
    −37.1%lower estimate
03 / RUN QUALITY77.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW9 SEC RUN QUALITY77/100

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The browser exposed fewer threads than the selected CPU has, so the multi-core test could not use all of them.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
CPU + Memory
Platform family
Linux
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
NOT RUN
Run quality
Good · 77/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "cpu",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 9438,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 9 9950X",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "not_tested",
        "processor_id": 68,
        "graphics_card_id": 75
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 9,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 1720975360,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 24604875464.66,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1158.648
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 159.186,
            "latency_ns": 8.157
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 84.36870419,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 9.25833746
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "thread_cap"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 100,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "grade": null
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 100,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "performance_index": null,
        "leaderboard_outlier": true,
        "grade": null,
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same CPU + Memory suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again