PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 9 9950X + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT browser benchmark
PC SCORE66OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEC
Excellent quality run 7 October 2026 · 23:48 EEST

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X+AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Solid performance with room to inspect individual workload results.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION03:38
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU84

Processor throughput

Single thread
955.22 Mops/s
Multi thread
12,149.95 Mops/s
Compression proxy
1,313.4 MB/s
GPU35

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
18,264.1 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
47.4 FPS
Frame time p95
16.80 ms
MEMORY96

System memory

Effective bandwidth
33.78 GB/s
Latency proxy
113.0 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.12 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 5 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

No faster peer is available in this comparison set.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 9950XZen 5 · 16 cores / 32 threads · 2024
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  2. AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3DZen 5 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2026
    −22.3%lower estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 5 9600XZen 5 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2024
    −37.1%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon Instinct MI300ARadeon Instinct(MIx) · 192 GB VRAM · 2023
    +67.9%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon Instinct MI355XRadeon Instinct(MIx) · 288 GB VRAM · 2025
    +61.6%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon Instinct MI350XRadeon Instinct(MIx) · 288 GB VRAM · 2025
    +48.2%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XTNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 9070Navi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −25.8%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −29.6%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −47.3%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY79.1%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW218 SEC DROPPED FRAMES20.88%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • Many preview frames were dropped, a sign of a contended or throttled device.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
32
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Edge 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Excellent · 95/100
Performance index
66.1 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 218122,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 9 9950X",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT",
        "logical_cores": 32,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "edge",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "amd",
        "gpu_architecture": "rdna-4",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 68,
        "graphics_card_id": 75
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 218,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 20.875
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 955224716.861,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 12149948936.469,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1313.427
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 33.779,
            "latency_ns": 112.977,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 47.43,
            "compute_gflops": 18264.109,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.118,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 51.5496755,
        "gpu": 15.22009083,
        "memory": 1.34711416
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "dropped_frames"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 84,
        "gpu": 35,
        "memory": 96,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 66,
        "grade": "C"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 84,
        "gpu": 35,
        "memory": 96,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 66,
        "performance_index": 66.09,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "C",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again