PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX + AMD Radeon 680M browser benchmark
PC SCORE56OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADED
Limited quality run 18 September 2026 · 17:06 EEST

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX+AMD Radeon 680M

Capable performance; the category detail shows where this system is strongest.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:46
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU67

Processor throughput

Single thread
772.14 Mops/s
Multi thread
4,551.04 Mops/s
Compression proxy
978.9 MB/s
GPU32

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
1,896.2 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
13.6 FPS
Frame time p95
133.30 ms
MEMORY86

System memory

Effective bandwidth
43.24 GB/s
Latency proxy
13.0 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
No sufficiently comparable desktop processors with complete specifications were found in this catalog generation.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon 680M comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 6600Navi II(RX 6000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2021
    +164.2%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 6500 XTNavi II(RX 6000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +70.4%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 6400Navi II(RX 6000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2022
    +5.3%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon 680MNavi II IGP(Rembrandt Mobile) · 2023
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon R9 M485XGem System(R9 M400) · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    −12.4%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 560Polaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    −22.8%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon E9260 PCIeEmbedded(9000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    −36.4%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY22.7%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW46 SEC DROPPED FRAMES77.35%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Linux
Logical processors
9
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Limited · 40/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 45787,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon 680M",
        "logical_cores": 9,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 677,
        "graphics_card_id": 2652
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 46,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 77.348
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 772136092.689,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 4551039016.918,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 978.927
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 43.241,
            "latency_ns": 13.041
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 13.602,
            "compute_gflops": 1896.162,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 133.3
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 30.14009192,
        "gpu": 3.16027
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 67,
        "gpu": 32,
        "memory": 86,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 56,
        "grade": "D"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 67,
        "gpu": 32,
        "memory": 86,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 56,
        "grade": "D",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again