PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 9 5900X CPU browser benchmark
CPU CATEGORY SCORE64PARTIAL · OUT OF 100
RUN QUALITY85
Good quality run 6 October 2026 · 23:53 EEST

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

CPU category score 64/100 from the processor-only suite. This partial result is not a full-system PC Score.

SUITECPU + MEMORY MODESTRESS GPU APINOT RUN ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION01:31
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU64

Processor throughput

Single thread
737.75 Mops/s
Multi thread
9,080.29 Mops/s
Compression proxy
1,045.7 MB/s
GPUNOT RUN

Graphics throughput

This workload was not included in the CPU + Memory suite.

MEMORY100

System memory

Effective bandwidth
43.88 GB/s
Latency proxy
82.0 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

This workload was not included in the CPU + Memory suite.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 3 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 5950XZen 3 · 16 cores / 32 threads · 2020
    +9.8%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 9 5900XZen 3 · 12 cores / 24 threads · 2020
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. AMD Ryzen 7 5800XZen 3 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2020
    −15.1%lower estimate
  4. AMD Ryzen 5 5600XZen 3 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2020
    −26.1%lower estimate
03 / RUN QUALITY85.0%

Protocol quality signal

This signal summarizes protocol completion, visible-tab timing and selected-suite capability. It does not invent a graphics stability reading when no GPU workload ran.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW91 SEC RUN QUALITY85/100

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The browser exposed fewer threads than the selected CPU has, so the multi-core test could not use all of them.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
CPU + Memory
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
17
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
NOT RUN
Browser
Brave 154 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Good · 85/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "cpu",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 90868,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 9 5900X",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT",
        "logical_cores": 17,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "not_tested",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "brave",
        "browser_version": 154,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "processor_id": 49,
        "graphics_card_id": 60
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 91,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 737752792.505,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 9080292370.864,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1045.67
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 43.876,
            "latency_ns": 81.964,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 39.53265238,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 1.78652859
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "thread_cap"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 64,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 100,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "grade": null
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 64,
        "gpu": null,
        "memory": 100,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": null,
        "performance_index": null,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": null,
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same CPU + Memory suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again