PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 browser benchmark
PC SCORE100OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADES+
Limited quality run 28 September 2026 · 00:06 EEST

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D+AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700

Exceptional browser-level performance across the workloads measured in this suite.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:07
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU100

Processor throughput

Single thread
1,604.60 Mops/s
Multi thread
22,265.76 Mops/s
Compression proxy
1,145.4 MB/s
GPU100

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
22,328.0 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
13.3 FPS
Frame time p95
103.00 ms
MEMORY100

System memory

Effective bandwidth
150.83 GB/s
Latency proxy
10.0 ns
Browser RAM class
— GB class
VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 5 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3DZen 5 · 12 cores / 24 threads · 2025
    +18.5%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3DZen 5 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2024
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. AMD Ryzen 5 9600XZen 5 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2024
    −15.4%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon Instinct MI355XRadeon Instinct(MIx) · 288 GB VRAM · 2025
    +64.4%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon Instinct MI350XRadeon Instinct(MIx) · 288 GB VRAM · 2025
    +50.7%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XTNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +1.7%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Radeon Pro Navi(Navi IV Series) · 32 GB VRAM · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRENavi III(RX 7000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2024
    −3.9%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 7800 XTNavi III(RX 7000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2023
    −22.0%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 9070Navi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −24.5%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY21.8%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW187 SEC DROPPED FRAMES78.19%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Linux
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGL 2
Run quality
Limited · 40/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 186725,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "linux",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 69,
        "graphics_card_id": 2828
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 187,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 78.185
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 1604600323.838,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 22265756240.545,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1145.4
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 150.827,
            "latency_ns": 10.044
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 13.327,
            "compute_gflops": 22328.015,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 103
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 78.64405753,
        "gpu": 37.21335833
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 100,
        "memory": 100,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 100,
        "grade": "S+"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 100,
        "gpu": 100,
        "memory": 100,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 100,
        "grade": "S+",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again