PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 browser benchmark
PC SCORE14OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 14 September 2026 · 12:04 EEST

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION01:02
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU16

Processor throughput

Single thread
259.43 Mops/s
Multi thread
595.05 Mops/s
Compression proxy
345.0 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
132.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
23.0 FPS
Frame time p95
33.40 ms
MEMORY37

System memory

Effective bandwidth
11.64 GB/s
Latency proxy
100.4 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.43 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 5 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3DZen 5 · 12 cores / 24 threads · 2025
    +24.7%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 7 9700XZen 5 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2024
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. AMD Ryzen 5 9600XZen 5 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2024
    −10.9%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090GeForce 50 · 32 GB VRAM · 2025
    +239.5%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080GeForce 50 · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +82.3%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 TiGeForce 50 · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +42.3%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070GeForce 50 · 12 GB VRAM · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GBGeForce 50 · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    −23.2%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060GeForce 50 · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    −37.9%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050GeForce 50 · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    −57.3%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY38.3%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW62 SEC DROPPED FRAMES61.69%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 62377,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 7 9700X",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 66,
        "graphics_card_id": 37
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 62,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 61.692
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 259426201.7,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 595054835.493,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 344.952
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 11.642,
            "latency_ns": 100.413
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 23.001,
            "compute_gflops": 132.432,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 33.4
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.434,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 7.00894755,
        "gpu": 0.11036
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 16,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 37,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 14,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 16,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 37,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 14,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again