PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + Intel Arc B580 browser benchmark
PC SCORE78OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEB
Excellent quality run 5 October 2026 · 04:34 EEST

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X+Intel Arc B580

Very good performance for demanding everyday and creative workloads.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:38
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU93

Processor throughput

Single thread
900.95 Mops/s
Multi thread
7,836.36 Mops/s
Compression proxy
1,218.8 MB/s
GPU56

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
6,663.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
142.0 FPS
Frame time p95
5.10 ms
MEMORY96

System memory

Effective bandwidth
67.24 GB/s
Latency proxy
9.4 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
5.01 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 5 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3DZen 5 · 12 cores / 24 threads · 2025
    +24.7%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 7 9700XZen 5 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2024
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  3. AMD Ryzen 5 9600XZen 5 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2024
    −10.9%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

Intel Arc B580 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. Intel Arc A770Alchemist(Arc 7) · 16 GB VRAM · 2022
    +43.8%higher estimate
  2. Intel Arc A750Alchemist(Arc 7) · 8 GB VRAM · 2022
    +25.8%higher estimate
  3. Intel Arc B580Battlemage(Arc 5) · 12 GB VRAM · 2024
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  4. Intel Arc A580Alchemist(Arc 5) · 8 GB VRAM · 2023
    −10.1%lower estimate
  5. Intel Arc Pro B60Battlemage(Pro Series) · 24 GB VRAM · 2025
    −10.1%lower estimate
  6. Intel Arc B570Battlemage(Arc 5) · 10 GB VRAM · 2025
    −15.7%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY90.2%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW218 SEC DROPPED FRAMES9.78%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
16
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Excellent · 93/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 217632,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 7 9700X",
        "gpu_name": "Intel Arc B580",
        "logical_cores": 16,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 66,
        "graphics_card_id": 88
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 218,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 9.775
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 900949105.218,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 7836360217.363,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1218.81
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 67.241,
            "latency_ns": 9.43
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 142.046,
            "compute_gflops": 6663.412,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 5.1
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 5.01,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 41.6280251,
        "gpu": 5.55284333
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 93,
        "gpu": 56,
        "memory": 96,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 78,
        "grade": "B"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 93,
        "gpu": 56,
        "memory": 96,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 78,
        "grade": "B",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again