PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB browser benchmark
PC SCORE22OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 25 August 2026 · 09:59 EEST

AMD Ryzen 7 7700+AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:20
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU7

Processor throughput

Single thread
91.17 Mops/s
Multi thread
770.74 Mops/s
Compression proxy
37.5 MB/s
GPU7

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
836.7 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
34.5 FPS
Frame time p95
66.60 ms
MEMORY91

System memory

Effective bandwidth
61.60 GB/s
Latency proxy
32.2 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.64 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 7 7700 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
No sufficiently comparable desktop processors with complete specifications were found in this catalog generation.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XTNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +89.8%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 9070Navi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +40.9%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +33.7%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 7600 XTNavi III(RX 7000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2024
    −12.0%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRENavi III(RX 7000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    −13.9%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 9060Navi IV(RX 9000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    −16.4%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY57.3%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW20 SEC DROPPED FRAMES42.72%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
14
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Fair · 67/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 19637,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 7 7700",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB",
        "logical_cores": 14,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 636,
        "graphics_card_id": 2837
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 20,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 42.715
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 91172192.4,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 770744929.03,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 37.548
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 61.596,
            "latency_ns": 32.218
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 34.453,
            "compute_gflops": 836.662,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 66.6
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.635,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 3.28321511,
        "gpu": 0.69721833
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 7,
        "gpu": 7,
        "memory": 91,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 22,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 7,
        "gpu": 7,
        "memory": 91,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 22,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again