PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 7 2700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti browser benchmark
PC SCORE26OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Fair quality run 19 September 2026 · 21:44 EEST

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:21
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU37

Processor throughput

Single thread
453.60 Mops/s
Multi thread
2,063.24 Mops/s
Compression proxy
674.4 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
157.8 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
12.8 FPS
Frame time p95
216.50 ms
MEMORY56

System memory

Effective bandwidth
15.38 GB/s
Latency proxy
40.0 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.81 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen+ desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

No faster peer is available in this comparison set.

  1. AMD Ryzen 7 2700XZen+ · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2018
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  2. AMD Ryzen 5 2600Zen+ · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2018
    −18.7%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080GeForce 30 · 10 GB VRAM · 2020
    +83.8%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2021
    +34.3%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070GeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    +25.4%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2020
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA TITAN V CEO EditionGeForce 10 · 32 GB VRAM · 2018
    −8.0%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12 GBGeForce 30 · 12 GB VRAM · 2021
    −21.4%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GBGeForce 30 · 8 GB VRAM · 2022
    −43.8%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY21.3%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW21 SEC DROPPED FRAMES78.73%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
8
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Fair · 67/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 20658,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 7 2700X",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 40,
        "graphics_card_id": 18
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 21,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 78.73
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 453600413.93,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 2063239314.993,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 674.355
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 15.378,
            "latency_ns": 39.973
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 12.816,
            "compute_gflops": 157.752,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 216.5
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.805,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 16.47933496,
        "gpu": 0.13146
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 37,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 56,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 26,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 37,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 56,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 26,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again