PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 + AMD Radeon RX 580 browser benchmark
PC SCORE48OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADED
Fair quality run 13 September 2026 · 23:56 EEST

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600+AMD Radeon RX 580

Capable performance; the category detail shows where this system is strongest.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:19
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU55

Processor throughput

Single thread
565.62 Mops/s
Multi thread
4,074.49 Mops/s
Compression proxy
839.3 MB/s
GPU26

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
3,064.6 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
38.2 FPS
Frame time p95
50.00 ms
MEMORY81

System memory

Effective bandwidth
35.48 GB/s
Latency proxy
11.3 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
2.47 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for nearby desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X12 cores / 24 threads · 2018
    +32.3%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 9 3900 Processor (OEM Only)12 cores / 24 threads · 2019
    +26.1%higher estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 7 27008 cores / 16 threads · 2018
    +5.5%higher estimate
  4. AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 36006 cores / 12 threads · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Ryzen 7 2700E8 cores / 16 threads · 2018
    −1.5%lower estimate
  6. AMD Ryzen 3 3300XZen 2 · 4 cores / 8 threads · 2020
    −11.9%lower estimate
  7. AMD Athlon Gold 3150G (OEM Only)4 cores / 4 threads · 2020
    −27.6%lower estimate
GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 580 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon Instinct MI8Radeon Instinct(MIx) · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    +32.7%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 5700Navi(RX 5000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    +28.8%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 590Polaris(RX 500) · 8 GB VRAM · 2018
    +15.4%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 580Polaris(RX 500) · 8 GB VRAM · 2017
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 570Polaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    −17.5%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 560 XTPolaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2019
    −28.8%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 560Polaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2017
    −57.7%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY63.5%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW19 SEC DROPPED FRAMES36.48%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Fair · 67/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 18878,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 580",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 587,
        "graphics_card_id": 47
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 19,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 36.482
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 565618656.568,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 4074493310.272,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 839.323
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 35.481,
            "latency_ns": 11.275
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 38.17,
            "compute_gflops": 3064.628,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 50
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 2.47,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 24.68865921,
        "gpu": 2.55385667
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 55,
        "gpu": 26,
        "memory": 81,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 48,
        "grade": "D"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 55,
        "gpu": 26,
        "memory": 81,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 48,
        "grade": "D",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again