PC SCORE29OUT OF 100

SYSTEM GRADEE

Good quality run 17 September 2026 · 16:59 EEST

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE with Radeon Vega 11 Graphics+AMD Radeon Vega 11

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:38

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU36

Processor throughput

Single thread: 454.90 Mops/s
Multi thread: 1,896.36 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 688.3 MB/s

GPU7

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work: 834.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput: 19.6 FPS
Frame time p95: 93.40 ms

MEMORY63

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 17.58 GB/s
Latency proxy: 28.5 ns
Browser RAM class: 16 GB class

VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth: 1.98 GB/s
Tested allocation: 512 MB
Validation errors: 0 errors

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for nearby desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X8 cores / 16 threads · 2017

+45.8%higher estimate
AMD Ryzen 7 1700Zen · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2017

+26.5%higher estimate
AMD 7th Gen A12-9800 APU4 cores / 4 threads · 2017

+2.4%higher estimate
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE with Radeon Vega 11 Graphics4 cores / 8 threads · 2018

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
AMD 7th Gen AMD Athlon X4 9704 cores / 4 threads · 2017

−0.5%lower estimate
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics4 cores / 4 threads · 2019

−2.7%lower estimate
AMD 7th Gen A10-9700 APU4 cores / 4 threads · 2017

−6.7%lower estimate

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

AMD Radeon RX 560 XTPolaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2019

+122.8%higher estimate
AMD Radeon E9390 PCIeEmbedded(9000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2019

+98.0%higher estimate
AMD Radeon RX 560Polaris(RX 500) · 4 GB VRAM · 2017

+32.5%higher estimate
AMD Radeon Vega 11Vega IGP(Picasso) · 2019

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
AMD Radeon E9172 MXMEmbedded(9000) · 2 GB VRAM · 2017

−36.5%lower estimate
AMD Radeon E9173 PCIeEmbedded(9000) · 2 GB VRAM · 2017

−36.5%lower estimate
AMD Radeon E9174 MXMEmbedded(9000) · 4 GB VRAM · 2017

−36.5%lower estimate

03 / STABILITY35.5%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW218 SEC DROPPED FRAMES64.50%

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: Full system
Platform family: Windows
Logical processors: 8
Browser RAM class: 16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API: WebGPU
Run quality: Good · 75/100
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale: Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 218464,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE with Radeon Vega 11 Graphics",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon Vega 11",
        "logical_cores": 8,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 579,
        "graphics_card_id": 2431
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 218,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 64.504
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 454895303.861,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 1896355365.771,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 688.342
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 17.579,
            "latency_ns": 28.514
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 19.644,
            "compute_gflops": 834.398,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 93.4
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.977,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 16.01644296,
        "gpu": 0.69533167
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 36,
        "gpu": 7,
        "memory": 63,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 29,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 36,
        "gpu": 7,
        "memory": 63,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 29,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again