PC SCORE95OUT OF 100

SYSTEM GRADES

Excellent quality run 6 September 2026 · 12:20 EEST

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X+AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Exceptional browser-level performance across the workloads measured in this suite.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:56

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU89

Processor throughput

Single thread: 966.60 Mops/s
Multi thread: 6,766.40 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 1,177.8 MB/s

GPU100

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work: 17,399.4 G shader ops/s
Render throughput: 52.6 FPS
Frame time p95: 16.80 ms

MEMORY100

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 147.16 GB/s
Latency proxy: 9.1 ns
Browser RAM class: 32 GB class

VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth: 1.39 GB/s
Tested allocation: 384 MB
Validation errors: 0 errors

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 5 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3DZen 5 · 12 cores / 24 threads · 2025

+40.0%higher estimate
AMD Ryzen 7 9700XZen 5 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2024

+12.3%higher estimate
AMD Ryzen 5 9600XZen 5 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2024

BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300ARadeon Instinct(MIx) · 192 GB VRAM · 2023

+67.9%higher estimate
AMD Radeon Instinct MI355XRadeon Instinct(MIx) · 288 GB VRAM · 2025

+61.6%higher estimate
AMD Radeon Instinct MI350XRadeon Instinct(MIx) · 288 GB VRAM · 2025

+48.2%higher estimate
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XTNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
AMD Radeon RX 9070Navi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025

−25.8%lower estimate
AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025

−29.6%lower estimate
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025

−47.3%lower estimate

03 / STABILITY87.7%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW56 SEC DROPPED FRAMES12.31%

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: Full system
Platform family: Windows
Logical processors: 12
Browser RAM class: 32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API: WebGPU
Run quality: Excellent · 91/100
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale: Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 56140,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 5 9600X",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 65,
        "graphics_card_id": 75
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 56,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 12.305
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 966602705.016,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 6766400895.948,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1177.774
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 147.16,
            "latency_ns": 9.069
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 52.649,
            "compute_gflops": 17399.39,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.8
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.391,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 40.09843578,
        "gpu": 14.49949167
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 89,
        "gpu": 100,
        "memory": 100,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 95,
        "grade": "S"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 89,
        "gpu": 100,
        "memory": 100,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 95,
        "grade": "S",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again