PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB browser benchmark
PC SCORE42OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 8 October 2026 · 13:27 EEST

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X+AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION00:20
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU62

Processor throughput

Single thread
1,677.70 Mops/s
Multi thread
3,373.57 Mops/s
Compression proxy
1,179.5 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
514.7 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
60.2 FPS
Frame time p95
16.68 ms
MEMORY91

System memory

Effective bandwidth
30.36 GB/s
Latency proxy
107.7 ns
Browser RAM class
— GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.48 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 5 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3DZen 5 · 12 cores / 24 threads · 2025
    +40.0%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 7 9700XZen 5 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2024
    +12.3%higher estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 5 9600XZen 5 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2024
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. AMD Radeon RX 9070 XTNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +89.8%higher estimate
  2. AMD Radeon RX 9070Navi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +40.9%higher estimate
  3. AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    +33.7%higher estimate
  4. AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBNavi IV(RX 9000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2025
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. AMD Radeon RX 7600 XTNavi III(RX 7000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2024
    −12.0%lower estimate
  6. AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRENavi III(RX 7000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    −13.9%lower estimate
  7. AMD Radeon RX 9060Navi IV(RX 9000) · 8 GB VRAM · 2025
    −16.4%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY100.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW20 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.00%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The browser exposed fewer threads than the selected CPU has, so the multi-core test could not use all of them.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
2
Browser RAM class
Not disclosed
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Firefox 157 · Gecko engine
Timer resolution
1.000 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Good · 77/100
Performance index
41.9 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Ranked
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 19515,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 5 9600X",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB",
        "logical_cores": 2,
        "memory_gb": null,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "gecko",
        "browser_name": "firefox",
        "browser_version": 157,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": null,
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 65,
        "graphics_card_id": 2837
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 20,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 1677704170.213,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 3373565767.55,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1179.503
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 30.361,
            "latency_ns": 107.661,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 60.174,
            "compute_gflops": 514.729,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 16.68
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.477,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 37.8559703,
        "gpu": 0.42894083,
        "memory": 1.27824913
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "thread_cap"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 62,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 91,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 42,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 62,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 91,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 42,
        "performance_index": 41.9,
        "leaderboard_outlier": false,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again