PC SCORE56OUT OF 100

SYSTEM GRADED

Fair quality run 5 September 2026 · 07:44 EEST

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X+AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Capable performance; the category detail shows where this system is strongest.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGL 2 ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:50

Run same suite

01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU88

Processor throughput

Single thread: 946.80 Mops/s
Multi thread: 6,588.09 Mops/s
Compression proxy: 1,204.0 MB/s

GPU4

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work: 247.6 G shader ops/s
Render throughput: 0.0 FPS
Frame time p95: 0.00 ms

MEMORY100

System memory

Effective bandwidth: 119.24 GB/s
Latency proxy: 9.7 ns
Browser RAM class: 32 GB class

VRAMNOT RUN

GPU-memory diagnostic

No completed VRAM measurement was recorded for this run.

02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 5 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3DZen 5 · 12 cores / 24 threads · 2025

+40.0%higher estimate
AMD Ryzen 7 9700XZen 5 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2024

+12.3%higher estimate
AMD Ryzen 5 9600XZen 5 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2024

BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300ARadeon Instinct(MIx) · 192 GB VRAM · 2023

+33.1%higher estimate
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300XRadeon Instinct(MIx) · 192 GB VRAM · 2023

+33.1%higher estimate
AMD Radeon Instinct MI308XRadeon Instinct(MIx) · 192 GB VRAM · 2023

+33.1%higher estimate
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXNavi III(RX 7000) · 24 GB VRAM · 2022

BASECATALOG REFERENCE
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTNavi III(RX 7000) · 20 GB VRAM · 2022

−16.1%lower estimate
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRENavi III(RX 7000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2024

−25.1%lower estimate
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XTNavi III(RX 7000) · 16 GB VRAM · 2023

−39.2%lower estimate

03 / STABILITY100.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW50 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.00%

04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite: Full system
Platform family: Windows
Logical processors: 12
Browser RAM class: 32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API: WebGL 2
Run quality: Fair · 65/100
Score fingerprint: adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale: Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026

BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗

05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +

{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 49506,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 5 9600X",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgl2",
        "processor_id": 65,
        "graphics_card_id": 67
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 50,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 946797342.769,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 6588090148.646,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 1203.977
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 119.244,
            "latency_ns": 9.74
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 0.048,
            "compute_gflops": 247.57,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 39.51873276,
        "gpu": 0.41261667
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 88,
        "gpu": 4,
        "memory": 100,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 56,
        "grade": "D"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 88,
        "gpu": 4,
        "memory": 100,
        "vram": null,
        "overall": 56,
        "grade": "D",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}

SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again