PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X browser benchmark
PC SCORE4OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Limited quality run 11 October 2026 · 22:41 EEST

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G+NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTANDARD GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.3.0 SCORE SCALEVALIDATED R5 DURATION01:18
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU5

Processor throughput

Single thread
149.00 Mops/s
Multi thread
366.39 Mops/s
Compression proxy
52.6 MB/s
GPU1

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
316.2 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
0.0 FPS
Frame time p95
0.00 ms
MEMORY9

System memory

Effective bandwidth
1.60 GB/s
Latency proxy
387.9 ns
Browser RAM class
16 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.80 GB/s
Tested allocation
384 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 3 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 5900XZen 3 · 12 cores / 24 threads · 2020
    +36.1%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3DZen 3 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2022
    +7.6%higher estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 5 5600GZen 3 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA TITAN X PascalGeForce 10 · 12 GB VRAM · 2016
    +69.8%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080GeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2016
    +37.3%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2017
    +26.8%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5XGeForce 10 · 8 GB VRAM · 2018
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GBGeForce 10 · 6 GB VRAM · 2016
    −32.2%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce 10 · 4 GB VRAM · 2016
    −66.9%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050GeForce 10 · 2 GB VRAM · 2016
    −71.2%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY100.0%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDNO SAMPLE WINDOW78 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.00%

Why the run quality was reduced

  • The run did not complete; the tab was hidden or a selected stage failed.
  • The browser exposed fewer threads than the selected CPU has, so the multi-core test could not use all of them.
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
4
Browser RAM class
16 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Browser
Chrome 155 · Blink engine
Timer resolution
0.100 ms
Memory working set
256 MB
Run quality
Limited · 50/100
Performance index
3.9 · uncapped, 100 = reference
Leaderboard
Not ranked: far from the median of this hardware
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.3.0
Current adaptive scale
Validated revision 5 / 6 October 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations ↗
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "standard",
    "duration_ms": 77967,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 5 5600G",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X",
        "logical_cores": 4,
        "memory_gb": 16,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "browser_engine": "blink",
        "browser_name": "chrome",
        "browser_version": 155,
        "timer_resolution_ms": 0.1,
        "cross_origin_isolated": false,
        "on_battery": false,
        "gpu_vendor": "nvidia",
        "gpu_architecture": "kepler",
        "gpu_fallback_adapter": false,
        "processor_id": 51,
        "graphics_card_id": 2280
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 78,
            "completed": false,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 148998963.305,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 366393929.378,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 52.647
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.595,
            "latency_ns": 387.881,
            "working_set_mb": 256
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 0,
            "compute_gflops": 316.244,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 0
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 384,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.801,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 3.17541198,
        "gpu": 0.26353667,
        "memory": 0.12024872
    },
    "quality_flags": [
        "incomplete",
        "thread_cap"
    ],
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 5,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 9,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 4,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 5,
        "gpu": 1,
        "memory": 9,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 4,
        "performance_index": 3.9,
        "leaderboard_outlier": true,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 5
    },
    "runner_version": "1.3.0",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.3",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Standard mode again.

Run it again