PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + AMD Radeon Vega 7 browser benchmark
PC SCORE30OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADEE
Good quality run 6 September 2026 · 09:12 EEST

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G+AMD Radeon Vega 7

A completed baseline run. Review quality and raw metrics before comparing it.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODEQUICK GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION00:20
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU42

Processor throughput

Single thread
559.39 Mops/s
Multi thread
2,121.56 Mops/s
Compression proxy
867.4 MB/s
GPU7

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
791.0 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
66.9 FPS
Frame time p95
27.70 ms
MEMORY58

System memory

Effective bandwidth
13.57 GB/s
Latency proxy
21.6 ns
Browser RAM class
8 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
1.52 GB/s
Tested allocation
128 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Specification-based estimateApproximate browser CPU capacity derived from official core, thread and clock specifications for Zen 3 desktop processors. It is not a measured benchmark.

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 5900XZen 3 · 12 cores / 24 threads · 2020
    +36.1%higher estimate
  2. AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3DZen 3 · 8 cores / 16 threads · 2022
    +7.6%higher estimate
  3. AMD Ryzen 5 5600GZen 3 · 6 cores / 12 threads · 2021
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE

No slower peer is available in this comparison set.

GPU POSITION

AMD Radeon Vega 7 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
The catalog does not contain a trustworthy theoretical compute reference for this GPU.

03 / STABILITY93.9%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW20 SEC DROPPED FRAMES6.13%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
8 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Good · 87/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "quick",
    "duration_ms": 19589,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 5 5600G",
        "gpu_name": "AMD Radeon Vega 7",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 8,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 51,
        "graphics_card_id": 109
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 20,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 6.128
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 559385685.05,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 2121555389.969,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 867.435
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 13.567,
            "latency_ns": 21.636
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 66.926,
            "compute_gflops": 790.997,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 27.7
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 128,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 1.519,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 19.05752173,
        "gpu": 0.65916417
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 42,
        "gpu": 7,
        "memory": 58,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 30,
        "grade": "E"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 42,
        "gpu": 7,
        "memory": 58,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 30,
        "grade": "E",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Quick mode again.

Run it again