PCBenchmark/Results/AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 browser benchmark
PC SCORE47OUT OF 100
SYSTEM GRADED
Excellent quality run 5 September 2026 · 15:56 EEST

AMD Ryzen 5 5500+NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Capable performance; the category detail shows where this system is strongest.

SUITEFULL SYSTEM MODESTRESS GPU APIWebGPU ENGINE1.2.1 SCORE SCALEPROVISIONAL R4 DURATION03:37
Run same suite
01 / WORKLOAD BREAKDOWN

Performance by workload.

CPU and GPU use the current adaptive scale for the same workload, mode and graphics backend. When a faster validated device becomes the reference, older comparable scores are projected onto the new scale without changing their raw measurements. VRAM remains a pass/fail diagnostic.

CPU62

Processor throughput

Single thread
657.87 Mops/s
Multi thread
4,751.00 Mops/s
Compression proxy
851.5 MB/s
GPU21

Graphics throughput

Estimated shader work
2,578.5 G shader ops/s
Render throughput
60.0 FPS
Frame time p95
17.00 ms
MEMORY73

System memory

Effective bandwidth
24.93 GB/s
Latency proxy
17.2 ns
Browser RAM class
32 GB class
VRAMPASS

GPU-memory diagnostic

Transfer bandwidth
0.82 GB/s
Tested allocation
512 MB
Validation errors
0 errors
02 / RELATIVE PERFORMANCE

What sits above and below this hardware.

Each ladder uses one consistent source. Validated PCBenchmark medians take priority when the matching workload cohort has enough approved runs; until then, the report shows a clearly marked catalog estimate.

CPU POSITION

AMD Ryzen 5 5500 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Comparison unavailable
No sufficiently comparable desktop processors with complete specifications were found in this catalog generation.

GPU POSITION

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 comparison ladder

ESTIMATE

Theoretical FP32 estimatePercentages compare theoretical FP32 compute within the desktop GPU catalog; they are not measured PCBenchmark or gaming performance.

  1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPERGeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    +40.5%higher estimate
  2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070GeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2018
    +15.7%higher estimate
  3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPERGeForce 20 · 8 GB VRAM · 2019
    +11.3%higher estimate
  4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060GeForce 20 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    BASECATALOG REFERENCE
  5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    −15.7%lower estimate
  6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660GeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    −22.0%lower estimate
  7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPERGeForce 16 · 6 GB VRAM · 2019
    −22.0%lower estimate
03 / STABILITY99.9%

Sustained-load signal

This signal summarizes frame delivery during the timed graphics phase. It can reveal an inconsistent run, but it is not a temperature sensor.

COMPLETEDYES SAMPLE WINDOW217 SEC DROPPED FRAMES0.05%
04 / ENVIRONMENTRUN CONTEXT

What the browser disclosed

Selected suite
Full system
Platform family
Windows
Logical processors
12
Browser RAM class
32 GB · rounded/capped
Graphics API
WebGPU
Run quality
Excellent · 100/100
Score fingerprint
adaptive-v2.0 / 1.2.1
Current adaptive scale
Provisional revision 4 / 28 August 2026
i
BROWSER BENCHMARK, NOT HARDWARE ATTESTATION

Read this result in its proper context.

It measures this browser’s execution path under the conditions of this run. Cooling, power mode, drivers, background processes and browser updates can change the outcome. CPU/GPU names may be supplied manually or matched to the catalog from a browser hint. Compare only matching suite, mode, engine version and graphics backend. NOT RUN categories were not measured and are not zero-performance results.

Read methodology & limitations
05 / RAW RESULT DATAInspect JSON +
{
    "test_suite": "all",
    "test_mode": "stress",
    "duration_ms": 217295,
    "system": {
        "cpu_name": "AMD Ryzen 5 5500",
        "gpu_name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060",
        "logical_cores": 12,
        "memory_gb": 32,
        "platform": "windows",
        "gpu_api": "webgpu",
        "processor_id": 553,
        "graphics_card_id": 14
    },
    "metrics": {
        "stability": {
            "duration_seconds": 217,
            "completed": true,
            "dropped_frames_percent": 0.051
        },
        "cpu": {
            "single_core_ops_per_second": 657873341.745,
            "multi_core_ops_per_second": 4750995730.172,
            "compression_mb_per_second": 851.481
        },
        "memory": {
            "bandwidth_gbps": 24.926,
            "latency_ns": 17.168
        },
        "gpu": {
            "frames_per_second": 59.966,
            "compute_gflops": 2578.527,
            "frame_time_p95_ms": 17
        },
        "vram": {
            "tested_mb": 512,
            "bandwidth_gbps": 0.821,
            "errors": 0
        }
    },
    "raw_points": {
        "cpu": 27.96910117,
        "gpu": 2.1487725
    },
    "original_scores": {
        "cpu": 62,
        "gpu": 21,
        "memory": 73,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 47,
        "grade": "D"
    },
    "current_scores": {
        "cpu": 62,
        "gpu": 21,
        "memory": 73,
        "vram": 0,
        "overall": 47,
        "grade": "D",
        "snapshot_revision": 4
    },
    "runner_version": "1.2.1",
    "workload_signature": "browser-1.2",
    "scoring_version": "adaptive-v2.0"
}
SAME SUITE, FRESH CONDITIONS

Think this system can do better?

Close heavy apps, connect power, keep the tab visible and run the same Full system suite and Stress mode again.

Run it again